Hi, I configured the sensor factory. The sensor looks like this:

OK

I was satisfied.

But when I do something, such as updating the page data obnavlyayutsya themselves, changing the priority channel, with a view of what is going on, and it becomes like this:

Not OK

Appears an average value I do not need the average value the sensor. As a result the sensors to the form as the first screenshot?

tnx


Article Comments

Hi,
What is the channel definition for your sensor? And what precise version of PRTG are you using?


Feb, 2016 - Permalink

This is SNMP Custom sensor. (Cisco Bandwidth SNMP Sensor from Port-Channel)

For exemple one sensor from Sensor Factory:

EDIT: Removed second screenshot


Feb, 2016 - Permalink

Could it be that one of the sensors used in the factory sensor has very high readings? Are the division factors correct in the source sensor?


Feb, 2016 - Permalink

Now I checked all the sensors. All sensors have a division by 1000.

Sens For 4 sensors (ID 2,3,4,5) I use lookups

	<Lookups>
		<SingleInt state = "OK" value = "20000">
			20 Gb / s (Up)
		</ SingleInt>
		<SingleInt state = "Error" value = "10000">
			10 Gb / s (Break)
		</ SingleInt>
	</ Lookups>

For other sensors (ID from 6 to 11), I use lookups <Lookups> <singleInt state="OK" value="2000"> 2 Gb/s (Up) </singleInt> <singleInt state="Error" value="1000"> 1 Gb/s (Break) </singleInt> </Lookups>

All sensors values obtained in the range of 1000 to 20,000


Feb, 2016 - Permalink

I said on this <Could it be that one of the sensors used in the factory sensor has very high readings? Are the division factors correct in the source sensor?> , where's my answer?


Feb, 2016 - Permalink

Hi,
so far everything you configured looks ok from my side. The average is shown automatically (cannot be changed). However, what exactly are the sensors showing? Is it the available link speed on a certain interface?

The value of 101 Gbit/s would have to be received by a source sensor, so is this reading correct or would this be because of an overflow on the target device?


Feb, 2016 - Permalink

Sensor show this: Sens

It's Bandwidth from Port-channel

BW

Value of 101 Gbit/s - My devices (sensors) are not given to such values. Values can take between BW 100.000 Kbit / s to BW 20.000.000 Kbit / sec


Feb, 2016 - Permalink

Normally I would say the 101 GBit/s would be an overflow issue but as you are querying a 64 bit counter this is more than unlikely. Does the source sensor (Po20 3850- ...) reflect this value as well? If not then it might be a transfer issue of values between source sensor and the Factory sensor.


Feb, 2016 - Permalink

Sensor PO20 3850- does not reflect the 101 GBit/s value of such ... all sensors Values can take between BW 100.000 Kbit / s to BW 20.000.000 Kbit / sec

Decription for this OID for Cisco: An estimate of the interface's current bandwidth in units of 1,000,000 bits per second. If this object reports a value of `n' then the speed of the interface is somewhere in the range of `n-500,000' to `n+499,999'. For interfaces which do not vary in bandwidth or for those where no accurate estimation can be made, this object should contain the nominal bandwidth. For a sub-layer which has no concept of bandwidth, this object should be zero.

from http://cric.grenoble.cnrs.fr/Administrateurs/Outils/MIBS/?oid=1.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1.1.15


Feb, 2016 - Permalink

Could you please open a support ticket with support@paessler.com?
Please refer to this thread and send the full channel definition of the Factory Sensor as well as the Historic Data for the time the value of 101 GBit was shown.


Feb, 2016 - Permalink